0.09/0.10 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.09/0.10 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 240 THM 0.09/0.30 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu 0.09/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.09/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.09/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.09/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.09/0.30 % CPULimit : 1920 0.09/0.30 % WCLimit : 240 0.09/0.30 % DateTime : Wed Jul 30 06:17:49 EDT 2025 0.09/0.30 % CPUTime : 0.16/0.42 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.16/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=240 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.S6CwnDqF5D/E---3.1_13168.p 0.16/0.44 # Version: 3.0.0-ho 0.16/0.44 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSMNHSA. 0.16/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.16/0.44 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1200s (5) cores 0.16/0.44 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 240s (1) cores 0.16/0.44 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_nonlambdatoforall with 240s (1) cores 0.16/0.44 # Starting ehoh_best8_lambda with 240s (1) cores 0.16/0.44 # ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with pid 13247 completed with status 0 0.16/0.44 # Result found by ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall 0.16/0.44 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSMNHSA. 0.16/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.16/0.44 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1200s (5) cores 0.16/0.44 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 240s (1) cores 0.16/0.44 # No SInE strategy applied 0.16/0.44 # Search class: HGHNS-FFSF32-MHSFFSBN 0.16/0.44 # partial match(2): HGHNS-FFMF32-SHSFFSBN 0.16/0.44 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total) 0.16/0.44 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 145s (1) cores 0.16/0.44 # ho_unfolding_3 with pid 13252 completed with status 0 0.16/0.44 # Result found by ho_unfolding_3 0.16/0.44 # Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSMNHSA. 0.16/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 240 seconds (1920 total) 0.16/0.44 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 1200s (5) cores 0.16/0.44 # Starting ehoh_best_nonlift_rwall with 240s (1) cores 0.16/0.44 # No SInE strategy applied 0.16/0.44 # Search class: HGHNS-FFSF32-MHSFFSBN 0.16/0.44 # partial match(2): HGHNS-FFMF32-SHSFFSBN 0.16/0.44 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 240 seconds (240 total) 0.16/0.44 # Starting ho_unfolding_3 with 145s (1) cores 0.16/0.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 0.16/0.44 # Presaturation interreduction done 0.16/0.44 0.16/0.44 # Proof found! 0.16/0.44 # SZS status Theorem 0.16/0.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 0.16/0.44 thf(decl_sort1, type, qML_mu: $tType). 0.16/0.44 thf(decl_sort2, type, qML_i: $tType). 0.16/0.44 thf(decl_23, type, scott_G: qML_mu > qML_i > $o). 0.16/0.44 thf(decl_26, type, scott_ess_QML_mu: (qML_mu > qML_i > $o) > qML_mu > qML_i > $o). 0.16/0.44 thf(decl_28, type, esk1_0: qML_i). 0.16/0.44 thf(decl_29, type, epred2_0: qML_i > $o). 0.16/0.44 thf(decl_30, type, esk2_0: qML_i). 0.16/0.44 thf(decl_36, type, esk7_1: qML_i > qML_mu). 0.16/0.44 thf(decl_37, type, epred4_3: (qML_mu > qML_i > $o) > qML_mu > qML_i > qML_mu > qML_i > $o). 0.16/0.44 thf(decl_38, type, esk8_3: (qML_mu > qML_i > $o) > qML_mu > qML_i > qML_i). 0.16/0.44 thf(decl_39, type, esk9_3: (qML_mu > qML_i > $o) > qML_mu > qML_i > qML_mu). 0.16/0.44 thf(fact_4_ess__def, axiom, ((scott_ess_QML_mu)=(^[X20:qML_mu > qML_i > $o, X1:qML_mu, X2:qML_i]:((![X3:qML_mu > qML_i > $o]:(((X3 @ X1 @ X2)=>![X13:qML_i, X21:qML_mu]:(((X3 @ X21 @ X13)<=(X20 @ X21 @ X13)))))&(X20 @ X1 @ X2))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.S6CwnDqF5D/E---3.1_13168.p', fact_4_ess__def)). 0.16/0.44 thf(fact_9_T2, axiom, ![X4:qML_i, X12:qML_mu]:(((scott_G @ X12 @ X4)=>(scott_ess_QML_mu @ scott_G @ X12 @ X4))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.S6CwnDqF5D/E---3.1_13168.p', fact_9_T2)). 0.16/0.44 thf(fact_2_T3, axiom, ![X4:qML_i, X17:qML_i]:(?[X18:qML_mu]:((scott_G @ X18 @ X17))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.S6CwnDqF5D/E---3.1_13168.p', fact_2_T3)). 0.16/0.44 thf(conj_0, conjecture, ![X8:qML_i, X9:qML_i > $o]:((![X10:qML_i]:((X9 @ X10))|~((X9 @ X8)))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.S6CwnDqF5D/E---3.1_13168.p', conj_0)). 0.16/0.44 thf(c_0_4, plain, ![X48:qML_mu > qML_i > $o, X49:qML_mu, X50:qML_i]:(((scott_ess_QML_mu @ X48 @ X49 @ X50)<=>(![X3:qML_mu > qML_i > $o]:(((X3 @ X49 @ X50)=>![X13:qML_i, X21:qML_mu]:(((X48 @ X21 @ X13)=>(X3 @ X21 @ X13)))))&(X48 @ X49 @ X50)))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_4_ess__def])])])). 0.16/0.44 thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X85:qML_mu > qML_i > $o, X86:qML_mu, X87:qML_i, X88:qML_mu > qML_i > $o, X89:qML_i, X90:qML_mu, X91:qML_mu > qML_i > $o, X92:qML_mu, X93:qML_i]:((((~(X88 @ X86 @ X87)|(~(X85 @ X90 @ X89)|(X88 @ X90 @ X89))|~(scott_ess_QML_mu @ X85 @ X86 @ X87))&((X85 @ X86 @ X87)|~(scott_ess_QML_mu @ X85 @ X86 @ X87)))&(((epred4_3 @ X91 @ X92 @ X93 @ X92 @ X93)|~(X91 @ X92 @ X93)|(scott_ess_QML_mu @ X91 @ X92 @ X93))&(((X91 @ (esk9_3 @ X91 @ X92 @ X93) @ (esk8_3 @ X91 @ X92 @ X93))|~(X91 @ X92 @ X93)|(scott_ess_QML_mu @ X91 @ X92 @ X93))&(~(epred4_3 @ X91 @ X92 @ X93 @ (esk9_3 @ X91 @ X92 @ X93) @ (esk8_3 @ X91 @ X92 @ X93))|~(X91 @ X92 @ X93)|(scott_ess_QML_mu @ X91 @ X92 @ X93)))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])])])])])). 0.16/0.44 thf(c_0_6, plain, ![X63:qML_i, X64:qML_mu]:((~(scott_G @ X64 @ X63)|(scott_ess_QML_mu @ scott_G @ X64 @ X63))), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_9_T2])])])). 0.16/0.44 thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X81:qML_i]:((scott_G @ (esk7_1 @ X81) @ X81)), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_2_T3])])])). 0.16/0.44 thf(c_0_8, plain, ![X1:qML_mu, X3:qML_mu > qML_i > $o, X6:qML_mu, X5:qML_mu > qML_i > $o, X4:qML_i, X2:qML_i]:(((X3 @ X6 @ X4)|~((X3 @ X1 @ X2))|~((X5 @ X6 @ X4))|~((scott_ess_QML_mu @ X5 @ X1 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 0.16/0.44 thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X1:qML_mu, X2:qML_i]:(((scott_ess_QML_mu @ scott_G @ X1 @ X2)|~((scott_G @ X1 @ X2)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])). 0.16/0.44 thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X2:qML_i]:((scott_G @ (esk7_1 @ X2) @ X2)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])). 0.16/0.44 thf(c_0_11, plain, ![X1:qML_mu, X2:qML_i, X3:qML_mu > qML_i > $o, X6:qML_mu, X4:qML_i]:((((X1)=(X6))|~((scott_ess_QML_mu @ X3 @ X1 @ X2))|~((X3 @ X6 @ X4)))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_8])). 0.16/0.44 thf(c_0_12, plain, ![X2:qML_i]:((scott_ess_QML_mu @ scott_G @ (esk7_1 @ X2) @ X2)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])). 0.16/0.44 thf(c_0_13, plain, ![X1:qML_mu, X2:qML_i, X4:qML_i]:((((esk7_1 @ X2)=(X1))|~((scott_G @ X1 @ X4)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])). 0.16/0.44 thf(c_0_14, plain, ![X2:qML_i, X4:qML_i]:(((esk7_1 @ X2)=(esk7_1 @ X4))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_10])). 0.16/0.44 thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ~(![X8:qML_i, X9:qML_i > $o]:((![X10:qML_i]:((X9 @ X10))|~((X9 @ X8))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])). 0.16/0.44 thf(c_0_16, plain, ![X1:qML_mu, X2:qML_i, X3:qML_mu > qML_i > $o, X6:qML_mu, X4:qML_i]:((((X2)=(X4))|~((scott_ess_QML_mu @ X3 @ X1 @ X2))|~((X3 @ X6 @ X4)))), inference(eliminate_leibniz_eq,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[]), c_0_8])). 0.16/0.44 thf(c_0_17, plain, ![X2:qML_i, X4:qML_i]:((scott_ess_QML_mu @ scott_G @ (esk7_1 @ X2) @ X4)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_14])). 0.16/0.44 thf(c_0_18, negated_conjecture, (~(epred2_0 @ esk2_0)&(epred2_0 @ esk1_0)), inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_15])])])])). 0.16/0.44 thf(c_0_19, plain, ![X1:qML_mu, X2:qML_i, X4:qML_i]:((((X2)=(X4))|~((scott_G @ X1 @ X4)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16, c_0_17])). 0.16/0.44 thf(c_0_20, plain, ![X2:qML_i, X4:qML_i]:((scott_G @ (esk7_1 @ X2) @ X4)), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_14])). 0.16/0.44 thf(c_0_21, negated_conjecture, ~((epred2_0 @ esk2_0)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])). 0.16/0.44 thf(c_0_22, plain, ![X2:qML_i, X4:qML_i]:(((X2)=(X4))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19, c_0_20])). 0.16/0.44 thf(c_0_23, negated_conjecture, (epred2_0 @ esk1_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18])). 0.16/0.44 thf(c_0_24, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_21, c_0_22]), c_0_23])]), ['proof']). 0.16/0.44 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 0.16/0.44 # Parsed axioms : 18 0.16/0.44 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 0.16/0.44 # Initial clauses : 28 0.16/0.44 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 6 0.16/0.44 # Initial clauses in saturation : 22 0.16/0.44 # Processed clauses : 104 0.16/0.44 # ...of these trivial : 1 0.16/0.44 # ...subsumed : 7 0.16/0.44 # ...remaining for further processing : 96 0.16/0.44 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 4 0.16/0.44 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 0.16/0.44 # Backward-subsumed : 9 0.16/0.44 # Backward-rewritten : 4 0.16/0.44 # Generated clauses : 161 0.16/0.44 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 106 0.16/0.44 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0 0.16/0.44 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 0.16/0.44 # Paramodulations : 95 0.16/0.44 # Factorizations : 0 0.16/0.44 # NegExts : 30 0.16/0.44 # Equation resolutions : 4 0.16/0.44 # Disequality decompositions : 0 0.16/0.44 # Total rewrite steps : 16 0.16/0.44 # ...of those cached : 1 0.16/0.44 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 0.16/0.44 # Propositional check models : 0 0.16/0.44 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 0.16/0.44 # Propositional clauses : 0 0.16/0.44 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 0.16/0.44 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 0.16/0.44 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 0.16/0.44 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 0.16/0.44 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 0.16/0.44 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 0.16/0.44 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 0.16/0.44 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 0.16/0.44 # Current number of processed clauses : 49 0.16/0.44 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 5 0.16/0.44 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1 0.16/0.45 # Negative unit clauses : 8 0.16/0.45 # Non-unit-clauses : 35 0.16/0.45 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 40 0.16/0.45 # ...number of literals in the above : 106 0.16/0.45 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 0.16/0.45 # Current number of archived clauses : 47 0.16/0.45 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 194 0.16/0.45 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 176 0.16/0.45 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8 0.16/0.45 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 45 0.16/0.45 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 0.16/0.45 # BW rewrite match attempts : 174 0.16/0.45 # BW rewrite match successes : 28 0.16/0.45 # Condensation attempts : 104 0.16/0.45 # Condensation successes : 0 0.16/0.45 # Termbank termtop insertions : 5908 0.16/0.45 # Search garbage collected termcells : 646 0.16/0.45 0.16/0.45 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.16/0.45 # User time : 0.009 s 0.16/0.45 # System time : 0.004 s 0.16/0.45 # Total time : 0.013 s 0.16/0.45 # Maximum resident set size: 1928 pages 0.16/0.45 0.16/0.45 # ------------------------------------------------- 0.16/0.45 # User time : 0.011 s 0.16/0.45 # System time : 0.006 s 0.16/0.45 # Total time : 0.016 s 0.16/0.45 # Maximum resident set size: 1764 pages 0.16/0.45 % E exiting 0.16/0.45 % E exiting 0.16/0.45 EOF